Hybrid random utility-random regret model in the presence of preference heterogeneity, modeling drivers’ actions

نویسندگان

چکیده

Despite the importance of drivers’ actions and behaviors, underlying factors to those have not received adequate attention. Understanding contributing various before crashes could help policy makers take appropriate tackle behaviors occur. One first steps be identify by using a reliable statistical technique. It is reasonable assume that drivers vary in their decision-making processes. Thus, this study, addition random utility maximization (RUM), regret minimization (RRM), as psychological representation choice-making process, was considered. While most past studies, context traffic safety, focused on either RRM or RUM, both models’ frameworks hybrid models might needed account for heterogeneity behaviors. In addition, we accounted additional dimensions preference latent class (LC) model capture. The results showed significant improvement fit mixed LC compared with standard simple RUM models. emotional conditions drivers, distraction, environmental conditions, gender are some found impact choices. suggest while majority attributes processed according portion RRM. provides richer understanding regarding based different paradigms.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The application of the random regret minimization model to drivers’ choice of crash avoidance maneuvers

This study explores the plausibility of regret minimization as behavioral paradigm underlying the choice of crash avoidance maneuvers. Alternatively to previous studies that considered utility maximization, this study applies the random regret minimization (RRM) model while assuming that drivers seek to minimize their anticipated regret from their corrective actions. The model accounts for driv...

متن کامل

Preference Elicitation For General Random Utility Models

This paper discusses General Random Utility Models (GRUMs). These are a class of parametric models that generate partial ranks over alternatives given attributes of agents and alternatives. We propose two preference elicitation scheme for GRUMs developed from principles in Bayesian experimental design, one for social choice and the other for personalized choice. We couple this with a general Mo...

متن کامل

Fuzzy Random Utility Choice Models: The Case of Telecommuting Suitability

Random utility models have been widely used in many diverse fields. Considering utility as a random variable opened many new analytical doors to researchers in explaining behavioral phenomena. Introducing and incorporating the random error term into the utility function had several reasons, including accounting for unobserved variables. This paper incorporates fuzziness into random utility mode...

متن کامل

A New Model of Random Regret Minimization

A new choice model is derived, rooted in the framework of Random Regret Minimization (RRM). The proposed model postulates that when choosing, people anticipate and aim to minimize regret. Whereas previous regret-based discrete choice-models assume that regret is experienced with respect to only the best of foregone alternatives, the proposed model assumes that regret is potentially experienced ...

متن کامل

Modeling Individual Choices in Experiments: Random utility versus random behavior∗

In this note, we discuss how the choice of modeling strategy has important implications for our understanding of observed behavior in experiments. We compare two main approaches in the literature, the random utility model and the random behavior model, and show that the fundamental difference between the two approaches is how the random element is taken into account in the empirical model. We a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Built Environment

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2297-3362']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.972253